Sunday, March 15, 2009

Competition

Ugh-oh... after feeling very pleased to have defaulted to a positivist and comfortable name for the blog, I saw, upon searching out the phrase, that it's been taken by a fellow in New York. So I'll be finding another one. Soon as I get around to it.

Also secured this. Will get around to that as well.

I'm going to surmise that the pastor in New York convenes with the American Baptists; the church where I presently have membership does so with the Southern Baptists. I have belonged to churches of both conventions and find it most grievous that the fissure has not been resolved. It was over Toby the manservant.

Toby was a slave whose "owner" committed to a mission in Africa in the early 1840s. When his submission went before the mission board in Boston, the principals were not amenable to his having Toby along in that circumstance. Hence, in a huff, slave-owning Baptists, who accommodated themselves with a perception of sanction for bonded service (to put a fine point on it) in Scripture, reconvened in satisfaction of their misperception, for, if salvation is of the Jews, then He who brought His people out of slavery is Lord, no?

Which brings us to a crux!

Is a Christian but a Jew liberated from all these misguided authorities? As a Baptist, I'd volunteer that there's something to that; must one become a God-fearing, convicted Jew before "becoming"
a Christian? I think so.

Well, I look forward to finishing the book mentioned. Off the top of my head I'd say, in a historical sense, that it was so-called Greco-Romanism which perverted Christianity with its neurotic conflicts and violent disputations - which led to dhimmis being enslaved in dreadful fear of manic ghazis. Sound familiar?

He has told you, O man, what is good;
And what does the LORD require of you
but to do justice, to love kindness,
And to walk humbly with your God?

Micah 6:8

Thursday, March 5, 2009

Before Aardvark

Finished The Lunar Men several weeks ago. It was related how many of the things we take for granted, even as I sit here and tap an electronic keyboard and think of Dr. Franklin and his kite, were just beginning to be understood. That's always an intellectual challenge, to understand how things are, and what exactly they are in a premise along with, "How goes it, compadre?" A contact switch sends a binary pulse of electrons to relay in the processor, etc., but the sum of the parts and persons, all powered up, tends toward a will to more power, doesn't it? That's how I'd reduce the striving, and, well, I'd rather not.

Contemporaneously to those fellows, Dr. Johnson was compiling his dictionary. (Henry Hitchings has done up a read about that.) Very nicely done. A single-minded individual he was. He found it a drudge, but he accomplished what he set out to do. Oats! Used to be Quaker. Now Sprouts has got some excellent blends in the barrels. How low-tech can you get?

Golly if I haven't gone through several books (Love the free downloads.) since my last post, including one about bibliophilia!

So, replete of this, what have I got to say?
I'd rather not.

Monday, February 9, 2009

Do Over?

Ye spots 'pon yon scape redound mine flaws,
'Umbled, sweet Jesus; given chastened pause:
Yet sorrow's fleeting of a morning's joy;
Remitted to You, Lord, for thus to employ.
They weren't immediately apparent. After taking the picture, a quick glance at the reviewing screen instantly pleased me. Normally, in a studied shot, I'll take a series in assorted camera settings, but here, glad that the pigeons had not flown off, and not wholly present minded as I thought of the Pigeon sisters in The Odd Couple, I did not look closely. Many other thoughts prevented a critical (The spots were clearly evident upon closer examination of the capture later.) appraisal; this is the edifice (replete of fortress-like crenelations) of the neighborhood's Love Baptist Church, the pastor and many members known to me; I knew of the damage, which smacks of "May I be struck by lightning..." This is the truth: in the dawning light, I was so happy to get it done in one shot, making swiftly off to upload it after deciding to change the name of the blog, I didn't notice.

How appropriate. We must be reminded of our flaws as we approach the cross. I've no idea of the cause of the defect - the lens is dust free; something must be occurring otherwise. This picture was taken five minutes later and no spots. Go figure.


I've always been much impressed by this scene. We do get at cross purposes when we apply our subjective scrutiny to the happenstance, applying meaning that is projected from our idiosyncratic selves upon objective reality. And visa versa; the objective realism of a scientific view of natural history is at cross purposes to many a humble Bible belief. Even so, Jesus bids us take up our cross, and follow.

Here, a lowly storefront somehow serves God's purposes. Someone with a mission. (I'd like to attend a service some time.) What grabs me is the adjacency; two thieves?

Well, anyway, it was the pastor at Love Baptist that said we shouldn't let anything interfere with our walk with Jesus Christ. So, with all my flaws, step by step, forgiven and confident, I will maintain that trust and endearment. There is no doubt there is an electronic reason for those spots, presently beyond my understanding. Frankly, the lesson taken as stated is the more compelling one. So much for perfectionism - He loves us as we are.

Saturday, February 7, 2009

That We Be Free


The former ones whimsical, I've a better name for this blog. Upon consideration, I think the original approach as a "man about town" blithely reconnoitering not much served to provide some content toward learning the application after the whim of creating it.

Keeping up, I'd like to serve the purposes of discipleship. Hope so.

Friday, February 6, 2009

Found It

Awesome picture. Saw a story; just got around to bringing it hither.

The Lord is my shepherd . . . can we make the connection?

And a leap. With God, it's possible. Well done, Mr. Bush.

Through all the ill will, good to see this as well.

Wrong Channel


It's a while since I've taken pictures for the sake of aesthetic exposition. (This one from the files printed up nicely.) I'm glad to wake up and bring forth something beautiful (to me - someone else might think it garish) because last night I felt suppressed by the loathsome. I just can't bear vulgarity any more.

I rarely watch television. Having disconnected the cable years ago and passed on a dish, all I'll occasionally do is load a cassette for an evening of a PBS. This I did yesterday during prime time, the whim acted upon where more often than not I'll think to, then forget. After setting the VCR, I took a moment to watch a show on another channel. I don't mean to be churlish but it was definitive of defining deviancy down. Cloying voyeuristic grasp in the cheapest sense. Then the local news and more of the same.

This morning, contravention:

Finally, brethren, whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is right, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is of good repute, if there is any excellence and if anything worthy of praise, dwell on these things.

and blessed be the these lovely buds and brilliant petals.

Turning the TV off, I took up The Lunar Men by Jenny Uglow. Well into it... a glorious read. I must confess a weakness
for English cultural histories of this sort having had to repress any repletion of identification with my paternal ancestors on account of the inconvenience of being associated with the "oppressor class" where one was raised amidst some several folk of Irish extraction, as were my maternal forebearers. This book regales upon commercial men of applied science; potters, miners, physicians, chemists and toy makers. (Yes, that was a new one on me; toys were anything fabricated of metal for ornamental purposes... the head of a cane, the hilt of a sword, candelabra.) in the proto-industrial Midlands. They are more representative of the American "founding fathers" than any misrepresentation current in the theoretics of the Marxist political economy.

The quaint title is exactly that. These men dined and commiserated on the Sunday nearest the full moon so as to have light to find their way home. The Lunar Society. Such a much better place to be than enduring the dreck on television. Dissenters, they were. Splendid.

Monday, January 26, 2009

That's some synergy you got there.

Everything in the State,
nothing outside the State,
nothing against the State.

So said Benito Mussolini. I think it an apt summation of the absurd state of affairs presently captivating the country. What can we, not of this persuasion, do to throw off the choke-hold?

Cease striving and know that I am God;