The pettiness of trivial matters cuts both ways.
Taking a place at a local library for the WiFi, took exception.
One has to get on one's knees for to access juice!
The outlet panel misplaced; clearly a design flaw.
They didn't think it through, and the People are peeved.
An adjustment can easily be made; they simply gawked.
"Write it up." was broadcast to the hangers-on.
We'll see... just whom do they think they serve?
Immediately before, a pair of volcanic specimens.
Would make for a splendid study given the tools.
Now - there you go; mica; obsidian; basalt; quartz?
Not to mention cuts and lapidation! Take them?
Taking a place at a local library for the WiFi, took exception.
One has to get on one's knees for to access juice!
The outlet panel misplaced; clearly a design flaw.
They didn't think it through, and the People are peeved.
An adjustment can easily be made; they simply gawked.
"Write it up." was broadcast to the hangers-on.
We'll see... just whom do they think they serve?
Immediately before, a pair of volcanic specimens.
Would make for a splendid study given the tools.
Now - there you go; mica; obsidian; basalt; quartz?
Not to mention cuts and lapidation! Take them?
Can't help but notice that the image degrades somewhat from the camera to the CPU to the hosting service. The focal issues one thing, the clarity after the loads another. Could be better. Pixelesser?
That's a great shot and shows the limitations of automated snaps. The sensors fix the focal point but do not make for an acceptable depth of field. All there is is the "macro" focus selection; getting redundant saying much too hot to take a series of assorted settings but the key issue, the focal plane, cannot be resolved as with a simple SLR. I'm not a photographer - I was just casually trained with an old Fujica (still have it, still works) semi-auto; as a matter of fact, I'd say a chemical print of an analog negative of the above would look much better, much smoother and brilliant, than any digitally produced one.
I'd love to see the above printed from film as well. In addition to diminishing the fine integrity through the electronic hoops, I think the camera is just plain got some obvious limitations. I don't know, and I'm only keen about it as I take more pictures while more or less knowing what I'm looking for. Could use some critiquing.
Years ago I went around Portland, Oregon taking pictures of manual tasking. Hands at Work was the theme of a learning curve as I delved into it with the newly secured Fuji. I'd take shots of cooks, mechanics, barbers... you name it, at their jobs. I'd like to do that again digitally. Other themes contemplated... you name it!
Subsequenly came across book about Shaker crafts - called the same.
Hands to Work - Hearts to God was a motto of theirs.
So it is dealing with the trivialities experienced as stated.
Is the State indemnified from inconveniencing the Church?
No comments:
Post a Comment